iPhone, Android, and the difference between usability and functionality [Sticky] | TiPb

TiPb.com vs. Angry DroidsLast night I quoted Marco Armant asking if Android phones would ever achieve iPhone-level polish and usability and a lot of Android enthusiasts fired back that they could do things on Android that they couldn’t do on iPhone, so Android was more usable.Well, no.That’s not usability, that’s functionality. Those two can be as diametrically opposed as simplicity and complexity…Copy and paste on iPhone is broadly consistent system-wide. On Android, even Gingerbread, there are at least three or four different ways of doing copy and paste in different apps, including Google’s own Gmail. They’re both functional but iPhone is more usable. FaceTime on iPhone 4 is locked to Wi-Fi but works the same way as placing a phone call. Android and before them, Nokia devices had front-facing cameras first but relied on 3rd party apps to handle the video call, even over 3G, but with decidedly mixed results. Android is more functional, iPhone is more usable.I’ve mentioned other things before as

via iPhone, Android, and the difference between usability and functionality [Sticky] | TiPb.

Unknown's avatar

About StevenTorresRamos

https://steventorresramos.com/about-my-blog/
This entry was posted in Interesting, [ STR ]. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment